compliance with the notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board issued under Section 89/14 of the Securities and Exchange Act. Remuneration Q: Does the company secretary receive the attendance fee
compliance with the notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board issued under Section 89/14 of the Securities and Exchange Act. Remuneration Q: Does the company secretary receive the attendance fee
····················›››››››››››››››››--------::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::///////////////············››››››››››››››››››››› ····················›››››››››››››››››--------::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::///////////////············››››››››››››››››››››› ····················›››››››››››››››››--------::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::///////////////············››››››››››››››››››››› ····················›››››››››››››››››--------::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::///////////////············››››››››››››››››››››› ···...
-86 -72 14 20% -76 -63 13 21% Administrative expenses -131 -105 26 25% -101 -79 22 28% Directors' s Remuneration -2 -2 0 10% -2 -2 0 0% Management's Remuneration -16 -12 4 30% -15 -11 4 36% Finance cost
% -290 -263 27 10% Administrative Expense -504 -494 10 2% -393 -391 2 28% Directors' s Remuneration -8 -8 0 0% -8 -7 1 6% Management's Remuneration -66 -53 13 24% -61 -48 13 26% Finance Cost - Interest
“Letter of Intent”). The remuneration to be received by the Company from the Investment Disposal Transaction amounts to a total of THB 307,013,425, divided into two parts, as follows: (1) The Company’s
remuneration is based on 2% of total revenues (excluding some categories of revenues that have already declared in the hotel management advisor agreement) which is approximately Baht 8 Million per year ( 1
remuneration such as Clubhouse application, Line group and Facebook without obtaining license from the SEC by in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions
securities or the suitability of investing in those securities of a person or group of persons to acquire benefit from securities in consideration of a fee or other remuneration, which was committed through
’ qualified opinions resulted from limitation on their scope of audit/review. Hence, the auditors were unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence with respect to valuation of investment in PT