punishment under Paragraph 1 of Section 283 of the SEA amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 6) B.E. 2562. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.283 Criminal

sentenced the accused to three year imprisonment. As the accused’s plea was useful to proceeding, the Court reduced the punishment by one-third, resulting in two year imprisonment. SEC Act S.90 and Section

accounting principles. Moreover, the auditor was unable to find sufficient supporting evidence to satisfy the audit procedures due to limitation on scope of audit imposed by the PICNI management in various

be able to offer for sale of shares to this type of investor without limitation on offering amount.     The consultation paper is available on www.sec.or.th. Stakeholders and interested parties are

. Previously, the SEC notified VTE to rectify its 2013 and Q1/2014 financial statements due to the auditors? qualified opinions resulted from limitation on their scope of audit/review. Hence, the auditors were

had committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the punishment prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) for being a director who acted to obtain falsified accounts or

Section 3 of the Penal Code. The Court inflicted the punishment of 1 year imprisonment and 1,00,000 Baht fine. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 6

), which is punishable under Section 274. In addition, the responsible management may be liable to punishment as prescribed by law. The SEC shall consider further legal action in due course

information to trade securities for his own and others? benefits  in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section 296 of the

dividend payment from IT Q4/2012 operational result. The aforesaid action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section