. In addition, there was the planned maintenance shutdown from Glow Energy Power Plants. With regards to the operating result in Q4/2019 compared to Q4/2018, the Company’s EBITDA increased by Baht 3,225
procurement process. In 2018, the Company delivered the large-scale projects with a value of more than 100 million baht such as a project of mobile signal and high-speed internet in a border area, a project of
maintenance for machinery and equipment after 10 years of operation and depreciation of machinery. The average capacity utilization rate in 2017 is 65.42%, close to 2016, at 65.79%. This is lower than the plan
221.12 million Baht from the Q3 of the previous fiscal year or 12.39 %. The cost increased less than the increase in sales despite the current high price in raw material as the company start to achieve
significantly in the past years. The above actions will boost six strategic moves set out in the strategic plan, comprising (1) attaining high regulatory standards on par with internationally accepted standards
are potential to implement the effective cash management right their proficiency and high experience. - Opinion of the Board of Directors and Audit Committee which is different -None - B. Purchasing Air
proficiency and high experience. - Opinion of the Board of Directors and Audit Committee which is different -None – B. Purchasing Air Conditioner 1. Transaction Date : February - March 2020 2. Connected Parties
proficiency and high experience. - Opinion of the Board of Directors and Audit Committee which is different -None – B. Purchasing Air Conditioner 1. Transaction Date : February - March 2020 2. Connected Parties
increase in FT rate and the increase in electricity and steam sales after maintenance shutdown of customers of Rayong Central Utility Plants in Q2/2017. Q2/2018 Financial and Operating Highlights * ไม่รวม
revenue compared to last year at the amount of 167.66 Million THB or 95.59% of total revenue. Net profit shows a high growth in the first half of 2017 at 23.63 million THB or 6.26% of total revenue compared