securities on a continued basis with an intent to cause the price or the volume of such securities trading to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. 22/03/2024 filed a lawsuit to a civil court
Public Company Limited ("NINE"). 28/02/2020 filed a lawsuit to a civil court26/03/2018 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under
("NINE"). 28/02/2020 filed a lawsuit to a civil court26/03/2018 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under the Court of First
- 17 Febuary 2015 to 2 March 2015 joined with other 4 persons manipulating the warrant price of NINE-W1. 28/02/2020 filed a lawsuit to a civil court26/03/2018 referred the case to a state
a civil court26/03/2018 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under the Court of First Instance considerationThe case that appears
a civil court26/03/2018 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under the Court of First Instance considerationThe case that appears
businesses in Thailand without proper licenses granted, violating Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546. The Bangkok South Criminal Court sentenced the accused to 1 year imprisonment and to a fine of Baht
company under Section 4 which issued debt securities. “Rehabilitation” means a company which has any one of the following characteristics: (1) being a company that the Thai court or the Foreign court has
Singapore Court, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sent a written notice on 28 July 2022, requiring Zipmex to clarify the matter. Today, Zipmex Group has updated the progress on the moratorium
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The Criminal Court dismissed the case. DV Act S.16 and Section