the financial risk perspective, despite the higher debt ratio stemming from increased loans and lower shareholder equity, the ratio was nonetheless at relatively low level. The interest coverage ratio
. However, Return on Equity slightly declined from 14% to 13.7% due to lower debt and more reliance on internal operating fund. From the financial risk perspective, debt to equity ratio decreased from 0.5x to
’ equity as mentioned above. For the financial risk perspective, despite the higher debt ratio comparing to previous year, the ratio was nonetheless at relatively low level. Interest coverage ratio (EBITDA
addition, the significant improvement of return on equity was from the decrease of shareholders’ equity as mentioned above. For the financial risk perspective, despite the higher debt ratio comparing to
governance outcomes: 1. competitiveness and performance with long-term perspective; 2. ethical and responsible business; 3. good corporate citizenship; and 4. corporate resilience
the importance of past fundamentals in driving the MBEB phenomenon. 6/29/2015 32 Overriding Conclusions • From the perspective of fundamentals, it may be true that fundamentals, not growth per se
work perspective in its job descriptions and evaluation forms? 6 Does the firm establish the career progression route and how are senior managers/directors promoted – what criteria are used? What is the
governance outcomes: 1. competitiveness and performance with long-term perspective; 2. ethical and responsible business; 3. good corporate citizenship; and 4. corporate resilience
3.56% to 4.61%, the earnings per share was increased from 1.13 Baht to 1.34 Baht, the net profit was increased 18.39% and the comprehensive income was increased 45.31%. For the separate financial
fairness of their duty performance. • Board performance evaluation1 For proper supervision and review of their performance, the SEC Board, the CMSB and the Audit Committee must undergo separate annual