finance director, in seeking improper benefits from the rental and buy-back of advertising billboards. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.281/2

last year. We are witnessing a profound shift in communication between companies and shareholders—a shift to more regular, candid, behind-the-scenes conversations. We are also seeing investors exert more

example, the necessity behind the sale of such assets, the company’s liquidity position, the availability of adequate funds for debt repayment, and future action plans related to the sale of the

follows: 1. Price movement of SCIB-C1 was normal (a) SCIB-C1 experienced high price volatility, dropping from 3.14 baht on August 10, 2004 to a low of 0.94 baht on August 11, 2004 before bouncing back

by the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board. The inquiry official sent the case back to the Settlement Committee. SEC Act S.56(4) Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official

sent the case back to the Settlement Committee. SEC Act S.300 in conjunction with 56(4) Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 09/05/2023

statement for the year 2020 and those financial report within the period specified by the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board. The inquiry official sent the case back to the Settlement

the notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board resulted from the instruction or the failure to give instruction which is duly required to be performed. The inquiry official sent the case back

finance director, in many circumstances, as follows: 1. Misappropriating money through loan transactions for V Billboard Company Limited (VBB). 2. Seeking improper benefits from the rental and buy-back of

and buy-back of advertising billboards. 3. Seeking improper gains from land purchase. 4. Misappropriating TRITN’s money through transactions with VBB for securing locations for the billboards. The