.com In case, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the
case, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the
licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. This case is in the process
not been licensed to operate securities business. Thus, PFS jointly operated securities business without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992
range of investment products and financial services for alien expatriates and residents in Hong Kong, Moscow, Shanghai and Bangkok. The aforesaid person had not been licensed to operate securities
investment products and financial services for alien expatriates and residents in Hong Kong, Moscow, Shanghai and Bangkok. The aforesaid person had not been licensed to operate securities business. Thus, he
of investment products and financial services for alien expatriates and residents in Hong Kong, Moscow, Shanghai and Bangkok. The aforesaid person had not been licensed to operate securities business
EMM Consulting Company Limited EMM Consulting Company Limited ("EMM"), represented by company directors Mr. Alan Sydney Roy Lane and Miss Ratanaporn Aoonta, had not been licensed to operate