derivatives products to deposit money into banking accounts of two securities companies for Sureerat?s derivatives trading account. Such wrongdoing was in violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E
Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. Their actions therefore were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289, which are imprisonment for a term of 2 to 5 years and a fine from 200,000
involves severely illegal business. For example, human trafficking, drug smuggling or money laundering etc. Moreover, the issuer must not act in violation or non-compliance with the law, which may cause
investment units in the portion yet to satisfy the minimum of 5 year investment.The said action was a violation of conditions prescribed by the Revenue Department, causing the client to pay back tax deductions
trading order and the similar failure was found during the second investigation, in case of another client. Failure to record the securities trading orders was in violation of the Notifications of Capital
which were investment in gold futures, not spot gold. Accordingly, the actions of G.O.L. (Thailand) were in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16, subject to sanctions under
determine a violation and take an action on any individual or firm, the SEC would investigate and gather information, facts and evidence concerning the violation. Generally, an alleged offender may clarify or
of Business Development, the Ministry of Commerce, Nittimon’s action was in violation of Section 33, Section 102 and Section 105 of the Public Companies Act of 1992, which do not give chairman of
until Satang Corporation Company Limited shall improve and correct the violation properly. However, the mentioned amount of fines does not include daily fines starting from the day following the
imposed a fine until Satang Corporation Company Limited shall improve and correct the violation properly. However, the mentioned amount of fines does not include daily fines starting from the day following