, representing the investment amount of Baht 500,000,000. In this regard, the Company has resolved to authorize the authorization of directors to bind the Company or the Chief Executive Officer or any person
mutual fund without authorization from the client. She did not clarify the details of the new fund and failed to assess the client's risk tolerance before giving investment advice, causing inappropriate
usually represented themselves as agents of foreign derivatives brokers licensed by foreign regulators and thus required no authorization from the SEC. Falling into the trap by transferring money to these
accessed the company's system to review the trading information without any objection. The actions of {B} and {C} were deemed as obtaining authorization from client to make securities trading decisions on
entrusted to make derivatives trading decisions for the client from January to June 14, 2011. {B}, however, did so on June 15, 2011 without the client's authorization and she admitted to such unauthorized
/2551 Re: Rules for Applying for Permission and Granting of Permission to Derivatives Brokers to Establish Branch Offices _____________ By virtue of Section 18 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) as
/2551 Re: Rules for Applying for Permission and Granting of Permission to Derivatives Brokers to Establish Branch Offices _____________ By virtue of Section 18 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) as
Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorThor. 7/2551 Re: Rules for Applying for Permission and Granting of Permission to Derivatives Brokers to Establish Branch Offices _____________ By virtue of Section 18
loan and permission note were Baht 18.98 million or increased from the same period of previous year by Baht 7.53 million or 42.11% due to long term loan for construction and working capital. (7) Share of
. (6) Financial cost The Company and its subsidiaries’ financial cost from loan and permission note were Baht 18.07 million or increased from the same period of previous year by Baht 9.97 million or