{X1} and their supporters above were liable to be the offenses under Section 307, Section 311, Section 313 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with
, and using inside information for trading Roynet shares in violation of Section 300 with Section 56, Sections 59, 238, 241, 246 and 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The
Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission No. SorJor. 28/2555 Re: Reporting of Circumstances of Real Estate Investment Trust after Offer for Sale of Units ____________________ By virtue of Section
Commission No. SorMor. 30/2555 Re: Determination of Fees for Filing of Registration Statement, Registration and Other Applications (No. 32) By virtue of Section 19(3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E
Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission No. SorRor. 27/2557 Re: Regulations relating to Conflict of Interest with Real Estate Investment Trust _________________ By virtue of Section 9 and Section
private fund management by advertising, soliciting and using website http://www.qb-corp.com without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section
, soliciting and using website http://www.qb-corp.com without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section
advertising, soliciting and using website http://www.qb-corp.com without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. On October 3, 2018, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 90 and 289 of the SEC Act