July 31, 2007, the SEC probed into the case and found that {A}, {B}, {C}, {D} and {E} had colluded to trade RICH shares in concealment through 15 related persons securities trading accounts. They traded

to the first two editions of the projects. Qualified businesses will be able to attend training courses on capital market, fund raising and preparation for becoming a publicly traded company. Moreover

found that {A} had been authorized by his client to make securities trading decisions on the client's behalf with high trading volume. The communication record showed that {A} traded the securities and

lodged by client and examination report of RHB OSK Securities, the SEC further probed into the case and found that {A}  traded securities on behalf of a client of {B}. {B} was a {A}'s subordinate and took

probed into the case and found conversation in the LINE Application that {A} traded securities for herself through the client's securities trading account. During a certain period of time, she made a

into the case and found conversation in the LINE Application that {A} traded securities for herself through the client?s securities trading account. During a certain period of time, she made a number of

be traded while the clients merely accepted the transactions. For {B} case, it was found that he failed to completely record the client's trading securities orders for a number of transactions; the

complaint filed with the Department of Special Investigation on September 9, 2014. They traded UKEM shares in concealment on a continual basis, inflated and stabilized share price, and matched orders within

financial statements and effective information technology. This will enable them to operate their business effectively, determine business strategy in a timely manner and become a publicly traded company

decisions for them. From October 2012 to March 2013, he made trading decisions on behalf of the clients on a continuous basis with more than 300 million baht in trading value. Moreover, he traded for the