derivatives products to deposit money into banking accounts of two securities companies for Sureerat?s derivatives trading account. Such wrongdoing was in violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E

Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. Their actions therefore were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289, which are imprisonment for a term of 2 to 5 years and a fine from 200,000

involves severely illegal business. For example, human trafficking, drug smuggling or money laundering etc. Moreover, the issuer must not act in violation or non-compliance with the law, which may cause

investment units in the portion yet to satisfy the minimum of 5 year investment.The said action was a violation of conditions prescribed by the Revenue Department, causing the client to pay back tax deductions

trading order and the similar failure was found during the second investigation, in case of another client. Failure to record the securities trading orders was in violation of the Notifications of Capital

which were investment in gold futures, not spot gold. Accordingly, the actions of G.O.L. (Thailand) were in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16, subject to sanctions under

determine a violation and take an action on any individual or firm, the SEC would investigate and gather information, facts and evidence concerning the violation. Generally, an alleged offender may clarify or

until Satang Corporation Company Limited shall improve and correct the violation properly. However, the mentioned amount of fines does not include daily fines starting from the day following the

imposed a fine until Satang Corporation Company Limited shall improve and correct the violation properly. However, the mentioned amount of fines does not include daily fines starting from the day following

. Meanwhile, the given information must be true. Nonetheless, giving false information to the SEC or the DSI constitutes violation of law and subject to criminal penalties.