aggregate shareholding exceeded trigger point at 25 percent of the total voting rights of SLC, but they failed to jointly submit a statement of intention to make a tender offer and to make a tender offer for

acquired IHL shares through others, causing his aggregate shareholding of IHL to exceed trigger point at 25 percent of the total number of IHL securities sold, but he failed to make the tender offer for the

point by the date, but should also cover the list of funds that have failed to do so, which means funds that never reached the trigger point or able to but after the determined schedule.The amendments

interrupt international travel plans of directors to the point that listed companies are unable to hold the board of directors’ meeting to seek approval of the companies’ financial statements.” In

result, he aggregate shareholding exceeded trigger point at 25 percent of the total voting rights of KC. But he failed to make a tender offer for all KC securities within the period specified by the

of Agripure Holdings Public Company Limited (“APURE”) which caused their aggregated holding of APURE shares to exceed trigger point at 50 percent of the total voting rights of APURE. However, the

Agripure Holdings Public Company Limited (“APURE”) which caused their aggregated holding of APURE shares to exceed trigger point at 50 percent of the total voting rights of APURE. However, the offerors

shares of Agripure Holdings Public Company Limited (“APURE”) which caused their aggregated holding of APURE shares to exceed trigger point at 50 percent of the total voting rights of APURE. However, the

shares to exceed trigger point at 50 percent of the total voting rights of JAS. However, Mr. Pete failed to comply with rules specified by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by virtue of Section 247 of

in TAPAC shares to exceed trigger point at 25 percent of the total number of voting rights of TAPAC, but Mr. Surachai failed to comply with tender offer rules specified by the Capital Market