directors; therefore, in order to ensure the transparency of voting procedures and to facilitate the independent judgment of other directors, those mentioned directors abstained from voting in this matter and
connected directors; therefore, in order to ensure the transparency of voting procedures and to facilitate the independent judgment of other directors, those mentioned directors abstained from voting in this
of more than 75 percent of all voting shares; (12) a foreign investor of similar characteristic as the persons defined under Section 3 of the Derivatives Act, B.E. 2546 (2003) or those under (1) to (11
connected persons precluded themselves from meeting participation and voting, had consciously considered and has approved the entering into the related-party transaction following the aforesaid reasons, as
directors who have interests and/or directors who are connected persons precluded themselves from meeting participation and voting, had consciously considered and has approved the entering into the related
connected persons precluded themselves from meeting participation and voting, had consciously considered and has approved the entering into the related-party transaction following the aforesaid reasons, as
on their behalf by those agents. As sophisticated investors with influence, often including voting rights, institutional https://www.sec.or.th/cgthailand/TH/Documents/Assessment/ICGN%20Institutional
conflicts of interest. The revised rules also protect the best interest of investors by prohibiting collection of redundant fees, prohibiting the exercise of the voting right of the invested funds
management as well as proxy voting guidelines announced by institutional investors.?Securities business involves with other people?s money. The business operators should thus be a model for others by firmly
be sought via postal mail to save time and money; 2.In cases where a company?s share buyback results in any shareholder?s voting rights reaching or passing 25 percent, 50 percent or 75 percent trigger