corporate governance. For example, climate change risk, biohygienic and safety risk, disputes with the community risk, corruption risk, severe epidemic risk, etc.; 2.2.2 Investment risk imposed on the
40.32 percent, which was better than the target. Meanwhile, our robust capital position was sufficient to cushion against risk, and greater than the Bank of Thailand’s requirement. As evidenced, the
marginally from the previous quarter to 40.70 percent, it was better than the target. Meanwhile, our robust capital position was sufficient to cushion against risk, and greater than the Bank of Thailand’s
capital position was robust. As evidenced, capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of KASIKORNBANK FINANCIAL CONGLOMERATE (the Conglomerate) according to the Basel III Accord was 18.12 percent, with a Tier 1 capital
was robust. As evidenced, capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of KASIKORNBANK FINANCIAL CONGLOMERATE (the Conglomerate) according to the Basel III Accord was 18.55 percent, with a Tier 1 capital ratio of 16.19
circumstances. At the same time, our robust capital position was sufficient to cushion against risk, and greater than the Bank of Thailand’s requirement. As evidenced, capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of KASIKORNBANK
dropped from the same period of last year. At the same time, our robust capital position was sufficient to cushion against risk, and greater than the Bank of Thailand’s requirement. As evidenced, capital
to Equity Conversion Scheme 1.1 Policy of the Debt to Equity Conversion Scheme Jutha Maritime Public Company Limited (the “Company”) has suffered from the severe economic fluctuations due to the
in the fourth quarter of 2001, attracting significant interest from both local and international investors. In addition, the Plan calls for the fostering of a robust and balanced investor base as well
ratio was also close to the target, at 43.96 percent. At the same time, our robust capital position was sufficient to cushion against risk, and greater than the Bank of Thailand’s requirement. As