AJD shares to be incompatible with the normal market condition. 26/12/2019 filed a lawsuit to a civil court21/03/2019 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil
price or volume of AJD shares to be incompatible with the normal market condition. 26/12/2019 filed a lawsuit to a civil court21/03/2019 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a
the price or volume of AJD shares to be incompatible with the normal market condition. 26/12/2019 filed a lawsuit to a civil court21/03/2019 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a
of other persons before HFT disclosed the inside information to the public on 6 November 2019. 26/10/2022 31/03/2022 filed a lawsuit to a civil court06/07/2021 referred the case to a
information about the funds’ investment plans to trade securities for her personal or other persons’ gains (front running). The Criminal Court dismissed the lawsuit. SEC Act S.315 in conjunction with 311
under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty and a compensation at an equal amount to the benefit should have been received from committing the offense in a sum of 558,405 Baht together
defendant had committed an offense under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty in amount of 333,333.33 Baht. Moreover, the court ordered the defendants to jointly reimburse court fees to
a judgement that the defendant had committed an offense under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty in amount of 333,333.33 Baht. Moreover, the court ordered the defendants to