shares inconsistent with the normal market condition, to lure the public into the trading. He entered the settlement process but failed to pay the fine as ordered by Settlement Committee. The public

accounts to the point where the normal market condition became affected during 9 January - 28 February 2013. This case is in the process of inquiry by the prosecutor official. Fails to pay the fine within

PLC (CWT) by allowing the use of his trading account. On March 14, 2011, the Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 600,000 for violating Sections 243(1), (2), 244(2), (3) and 296 of

punishment of 2-year imprisonment and 8,000,000 Baht fine. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment and 4,000,000 baht. The jail term was

offenders have agreed to the civil sanctions imposed by the Civil Sanction Committee; Surachai has paid a fine of 1,635,871.25 baht while Orthai, Somsak and Phichayada have paid a separate fine of 500,000

as a listed-company director with responsibility, prudence, honesty and integrity. As a result, the Civil Penalty Consideration Committee ordered Mr. A to pay a civil fine and compensate the SEC for

with responsibility, due care and loyalty. As a result, the Civil Sanction Committee ordered {A} to pay a civil fine, compensate the SEC for any expenses incurred from investigating the offence, and

., imprisonment for a term of 2 to 5 years and a fine from 200,000 to 500,000 baht, plus a daily fine of 10,000 baht until the violation ends.The SEC, therefore, filed the criminal complaint against the three

Bangkok, April 20, 2016 ? The Settlement Committee has imposed a fine of 14,640,844.50 baht on Chayanont Weerayuthkosol for manipulating the share price of Chuo Senko (THAILAND) Plc. (CHUO

and a fine from 200,000 to 500,000 baht, plus a daily fine of 10,000 baht until the period of violation ends. The SEC, therefore, filed a criminal complaint against Mr. Malpas with the ECD Police for