of debenture without approval in violation of Section 33 and subject to the penalties under Section 268 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA); meanwhile, Ornpaphat and Kanyakorn
approval from the SEC was in violation of Section 33 and subject to the penalties under Section 268 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Criminal Fining Committee therefore has
the inside information were liable to violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535. Meanwhile, Somsak and Areeya, as aiders and abettors of Pittaya and Athueck, were in
also received benefits from other relevant acts. His action was deemed a violation of Section 89/7 and subject to penalties prescribed in the second paragraph of Section 281/2, Section 307, Section 311
AGM. According to the consideration of the Department of Business Development, the Ministry of Commerce, Nittimon?s action was in violation of Section 33, Section 102 and Section 105 of the Public
on {B} and {C}, respectively, for collusively trading TWZ shares with the intention to induce the general public into buying or selling such shares in violation of Sections 243 (2) of the SEA and
until Satang Corporation Company Limited shall improve and correct the violation properly. However, the mentioned amount of fines does not include daily fines starting from the day following the
imposed a fine until Satang Corporation Company Limited shall improve and correct the violation properly. However, the mentioned amount of fines does not include daily fines starting from the day following