without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289, and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003
remuneration such as Clubhouse application, Line group and Facebook without obtaining license from the SEC by in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions
, failed to order or act his duty resulting in SKFM violation of section 133 paragraph 1 and 2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. SKFM failed to comply with the rules, conditions, and procedures
of the complete construction and approved the full payment by IEC even though the construction was in breach of the contract. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official
acceptance of the complete construction and approved the full payment by IEC even though the construction was in breach of the contract. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry
District, Songkla Province. Mr. Bhusana and Mr. Marupong signed in acceptance of the complete construction and approved the full payment by IEC even though the construction was in breach of the contract
District, Songkla Province. Mr. Bhusana and Mr. Marupong signed in acceptance of the complete construction and approved the full payment by IEC even though the construction was in breach of the contract
District, Songkla Province. Mr. Bhusana and Mr. Marupong signed in acceptance of the complete construction and approved the full payment by IEC even though the construction was in breach of the contract
. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition, the
. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition, the