Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (DA). Under Section 289 of the SEA, the said violation was subject to an imprisonment from 2-5 years or a fine from 200,000-500,000 baht or both
PLC (CWT) by allowing the use of his trading account. On March 14, 2011, the Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 600,000 for violating Sections 243(1), (2), 244(2), (3) and 296 of
shares inconsistent with the normal market condition, to lure the public into the trading. He entered the settlement process but failed to pay the fine as ordered by Settlement Committee. The public
shares inconsistent with the normal market condition, to lure the public into the trading. He entered the settlement process but failed to pay the fine as ordered by Settlement Committee. The public
accounts to the point where the normal market condition became affected during 9 January - 28 February 2013. This case is in the process of inquiry by the prosecutor official. Fails to pay the fine within
punishment of 2-year imprisonment and 8,000,000 Baht fine. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment and 4,000,000 baht. The jail term was
by CFC process? Does the alleged consent to extinguished the case by CFC process The SEC Office presents the case to CFC for consideration. CFC considers and imposes a fine. Does the offender pay the
offenders have agreed to the civil sanctions imposed by the Civil Sanction Committee; Surachai has paid a fine of 1,635,871.25 baht while Orthai, Somsak and Phichayada have paid a separate fine of 500,000
as a listed-company director with responsibility, prudence, honesty and integrity. As a result, the Civil Penalty Consideration Committee ordered Mr. A to pay a civil fine and compensate the SEC for
with responsibility, due care and loyalty. As a result, the Civil Sanction Committee ordered {A} to pay a civil fine, compensate the SEC for any expenses incurred from investigating the offence, and