specified period. On December 24, 2014, the Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 227,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht

) to the SEC and the SET within specified period. The Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a total fine of Baht 121,500. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half

SEC and the SET within specified period. .The Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a total fine of Baht 534,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a

Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 234,500. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 117,250 and a further fine of Baht 250 each

financial statements for Q1/2014 to the SEC within the specified period. The Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 234,500. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by

2013 (Form 56-1, 2013) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a total fine of Baht 389,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced

. The Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay fines of Baht 242,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in fines of Baht 121,000 and a further fine of Baht

report for the year 2013 (Form 56-2, 2013) to the SEC within the specified period. The Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay fines of Baht 242,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced

per annum, with the promise that the company would repay the principal and generate the guaranteed returns gradually every 30 days until the investment contract expired. At the time of the inspection

without authorization and later, when the client found out and rejected such unauthorized transactions, transferred them to another client?s account with a promise to the account owner that he would settle