contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The Criminal Court dismissed the case. DV Act S.16 and Section
contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The Criminal Court dismissed the case. DV Act S.16 and
fraudulent acts and the receipt of a certain amount of bill of exchange (B/E) sale money. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. SEC Act S.307 308 311 312 in conjunction with 315 and
investment, and also build up immunity for themselves against fraudulent solicitations via a variety of tools for all ages. The tools have been designed to be compatible and appropriate for beginners who
), together with Mr. Krittiphat Ittisanyakorn (formerly named Mr. Pattarapob), then acting managing director and executive director, jointly made a fraudulent arrangement for KC to offer the 25 B/E issues at
director and executive director of K.C. Property Public Company Limited (KC), together with Mr. Sunchai Intarauksorn, former deputy managing director and executive director, jointly made a fraudulent
Mr. Soraj Asavaprapha While being a director of Jasmine International Public Company Limited (JAS), Mr. Soraj Asavaprapha failed to perform his duties with loyalty as a result of obtaining unusual
from key audit partners or before finalizing risk assessment forms. Even though the SEC’s subsequent reviews showed that there were no unusual circumstances that might result in the firms not accepting