currently available to the Company. These assumptions involve risks and uncertainties which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results

regulator (e.g. bank’s RWA calculation) ▪ Challenges of issuing green bond • Impact reporting: Data of cross-border projects/assets based on different local standards require methodology adjustment to allow

over the past few years using different definitions of transition. As this market grows, investors want to be sure that this is not greenwash but that the label is being used to identify activities that

Oster’s (2019) testing for coefficient stability. Our results survive all the robustness checks and thus appear to be strongly robust. Therefore, our results likely reflect a causal effect, rather than a

carbon, etc. To ensure consistency and credibility for those wishing to issue or invest with confidence in credible green bonds linked to bioenergy, it is therefore necessary to determine robust and 5

N/A N/A 746,100 KPI 3 2019 (Baseline) 41% 97% 100% N/A Table 2–VE’s assessment of CHANEL’s SPTs Level of ambition4 KPI 1 ROBUST KPI 2 ROBUST KPI 3 ROBUST 1 This opinion is to be considered as the

Currently, investors are usually required to provide a lot of information each time they request services from an intermediary and must repeat the process via different forms when using services of

to adaptation and resilience has two significant components: the ability of the asset to be robust and flexible in the face of ongoing and potential climate impacts, and the sustainability of the

/project operations into different economic activities according to the ISIC4 classification. Entities and projects are main actors of the real economy, but the Thailand Taxonomy’s operational unit is the

and 6.9% QoQ, making the revenue contribution grew to 4.2% of AIS core service revenue. Robust core service revenue growth (Pre-TFRS 15) with guidance maintained Core service revenue (pre-TFRS) in 3Q19