time of the incident, was considered that he deceived by presenting false statements and concealing facts that should have been disclosed to its clients, which led the clients to use Zipup/ZipUp
facts confirmed by Zipmex Thailand. Therefore, it is considered that Zipmex Thailand deceived by presenting false statements and concealing facts that should have been disclosed to its clients, which led
will invest in digital assets and to be aware that the supervision and regulation thereof by government agencies can partially reduce risks, such as the risk of being deceived and being taken advantage
made falsifying document deceiving this clients that the orders had been executed and claimed that the Automated Trading System (ATS) faced problems. He also deceived his clients to withdraw their
processed. Instead, he falsified documents to deceive the clients that their orders had been executed. He also deceived the clients that the Automated Trading System (ATS) failed to function and thus asked
) Plc., committed dishonest acts during 2006-2008. She deceived a foreign investor into affixing his signature on a blank securities withdrawal/transfer form, claiming that the client could not receive
. She deceived the client to transfer cash into his account and used the cash for her own securities trading. {A}'s actions were deemed dishonest, fraud, wrongful use of the clients? assets and
of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). The companies? actions were also deemed as defrauding the public under Section 343 of the Penal Code as they deceived others by (1) showing false
conditions. Furthermore, these transactions misled other persons to into thinking that these securities were traded in significant volume and lured others to participate in the trading. This case is in the