Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company

memorandum for the exclusive mobile phone project. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company hadn’t breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in

lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not

million, including the interest, on the ground of the breach of contract against the Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s

contacted for negotiation but there was no any conclusion. On January 25, 2017, the Legal Department sent out the second letter of payment request and prepared a set of documents to lawyer for prosecution if

out the second letter of payment request and prepared a set of documents to lawyer for prosecution if the debt negotiation was failed. On February 22, 2017, MAT contacted the Company to request time for

out the second letter of payment request and prepared a set of documents to lawyer for prosecution if the debt negotiation was failed. On February 22, 2017, MAT contacted the Company to request time for

January 25, 2017, the Legal Department sent out the second letter of payment request and prepared a set of documents to lawyer for prosecution if the debt negotiation was failed. On February 22, 2017, MAT

to creditors in the financial statements, except for the late payment penalties and interest of 7.5 - 15.0 percent per year. As mentioned above, Hero Experience has appointed the lawyer to be

, Hero Experience has appointed the lawyer to be responsible for these lawsuits and assigned the lawyer to negotiate with 1 0 creditors which the negotiation was completed in 10 creditors and inform them