should had been stated, according to the assessment report assigned by EARTH’s business rehabilitation planner (EY Corporate Advisory Services Company Limited), about the existing right of 2 coal mines and
according to assessment reports of 2 valuer companies that EARTH claimed that EARTH had assigned by himself. Such information is materially misleading about financial condition, business operation, or any
assessment reports of 2 valuer companies that EARTH claimed that EARTH had assigned by himself. Such information is materially misleading about financial condition, business operation, or any other information
to assessment reports of 2 valuer companies that EARTH claimed that EARTH had assigned by himself. Such information is materially misleading about financial condition, business operation, or any other
executive of SUPER, had an access to the material information by virtue of being assigned by SUPER to contact and coordinate with SCCC. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry
Issuer’s Adaptation & Resilience performance in respect of a waste management facility Box 1: Step by Step Approach to assessing the qualifying carbon intensity of Energy from Waste Waste Management Criteria
Scheme November 2018 * These Criteria also cover the conservation and restoration of non-forested land Assessing climate change mitigation and adaptation aspects of financial products is not
. Comply with Adaptation & Resilience Criteria Each facility must undergo a site- specific assessment, carried out by an accredited assessor using the ESG Gap Analysis Tool. This tool identifies gaps between
Assigned weights (%) 1st inspection cycle 2nd inspection cycle 1 2 4 6 5 3 Ethical requirements Client acceptance and continuance Human resources Engagement performance Monitoring 20 20 20 In de pe nd en t