? behalf. With the said authorization, he traded with high trading volume for a period of time. {A} admitted to Maybank Kim Eng Securities that he used clients' User IDs and passwords to send trading orders

found that {A} did not record a number for securities trading orders submitted for a number of clients. {A} admitted that he took trading orders via mobile phone.Failure to keep complete record of the

client had ordered to sell 50,000 shares at 19 baht per share on February 25, 2014 but {A} instead submitted the selling orders for 49,000 shares at 17.50 baht per share. {A} admitted doing such action

. The client, however, did not reject the transactions. Furthermore, most of internet trading orders were submitted via IP Address of KTB Securities.Panadda, in addition, admitted that she was responsible

accounts. Those orders were submitted without sources and {ก} admitted that he took trading orders via mobile phone. In addition, he received the trading orders from one client for another client's

a trading order from the client's securities trading account without her client's order. {A} admitted doing such action, reasoning that she was unable to contact the client at the time the share

Capital Nomura Securities PLC., a number of securities trading orders from an account of {A}'s client had no supporting evidence for a period of time. {A} admitted to Capital Nomura Securities PLC., that he

time with high trading volumes. {A} admitted that the client allowed her to make trading decision under the pre-determined value. After trading, she notified her client via recording telephone.The client

decisions on the client's behalf for a period of time. {A} admitted that the client allowed her to make trading decision to adjust the transferred securities from another securities company and she kept

derivatives trading account. {A} admitted that he asked for internet trading account's username and password of a client who authorized him to use the account to trade derivatives trading for his own benefit