. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment. The case was deemed final

. The Court inflicted the punishment of 16-month imprisonment and 5,333,333.33 Baht fine. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments, resulting in 8-month imprisonment and

guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 6-month imprisonment and 500,000 Baht fine. The court suspended the determination of punishment for 2 years. DV Act S.Section 16 Criminal

243(1) 244(2) and 296 of the SEC Act conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code regarding METRO and TUCC shares. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment and 8,000,000 Baht fine

permissible products are more complicated, risky and similar to those AIs have been allowed to invest domestically such as unrated bond and foreign sukuk. Moreover, all investors will have more investment

shall be liable for the punishment under Paragraph 1 of Section 283 of the SEA amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 6) B.E. 2562. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official

punishment under Paragraph 1 of Section 283 of the SEA amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 6) B.E. 2562. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.283 Criminal

sentenced the accused to three year imprisonment. As the accused’s plea was useful to proceeding, the Court reduced the punishment by one-third, resulting in two year imprisonment. SEC Act S.90 and Section

had committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the punishment prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) for being a director who acted to obtain falsified accounts or

Rules and Appropriate Investment Advisory (3) Knowledge on complex and non-complex capital market products e.g. derivatives, debt securities, and high-risk or complicated mutual funds (4) Investment