responsibility and professional due care in contravention of Clause 23(2) and to have possessed a prohibited characteristic according to Clause 31(1) of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board
Following an inspection report from Bangkok Bank Public Company Limited, a limited broker dealer and underwriter (LBDU) licensee, and the SEC’s further investigation, it was revealed that Pongsak had affixed signature on subscription orders, redemption orders and switch orders of investment units, in his position as investment consultant, without meeting with or giving advice to a client in any way. The SEC has considered that Pongsak’s misconduct of performing duties irresponsibly wit...
professional duties with responsibility and care** by signing the documents knowing that no actual service was provided. SEC, therefore, orders the following administrative sanctions: (1) {D
investment consultants above was deemed failure to perform duties with responsibility and deliberation as a professional in accordance with the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board.* SEC has
Bangkok, August 27, 2008 ? The SEC provided practical guidelines for listed companies? reporting responsibility with regard to securities acquisition/disposition which aggregately reaches or passes
Section 19 Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 Section 19. The Office has the power and duty to perform any act necessary for the implementation of the SEC’s resolutions and to perform any other
Section 19 Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 Section 19. The Office has the power and duty to perform any act necessary for the implementation of the SEC’s resolutions and to perform any other
underwriting limited to investment units (LBDU) and derivatives brokerage by requiring the business operator set up a compliance unit with clear duty and responsibility in writing and having adequate number of
. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under