SEC Act. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment. The case was deemed

the SEC Act. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment. The case was

. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment. The case was deemed final

. 2546 (2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125. On April 8, 2021, the Criminal Court sentenced the accused 1-year imprisonment and 1,000,000 Baht fine. Since the accused pleaded

Ms. Sa-ngiam Pimkotr Ms. Sa-ngiam Pimkotr failed to comply with the competent officer's order to testify. The Pathumwan District Court sentenced the accused to three-month imprisonment and a

Ms. Somboon Pangphet Ms. Somboon Pangphet failed to comply with the competent officer's order to testify. The Pathumwan District Court sentenced the accused to three-month imprisonment and a

Mr. Chusak Ruentip Mr. Chusak Ruentip failed to comply with the competent officer's order. The Court sentenced the accused to 15-day imprisonment and a fine of Baht 2,000. The jail term, however

sentenced the accused to three year imprisonment. As the accused’s plea was useful to proceeding, the Court reduced the punishment by one-third, resulting in two year imprisonment. SEC Act S.90 and Section

, violating Section 301. On February 9, 2011, the court sentenced the accused to one-year imprisonment. The accused appealed against the judgment of the Court. SEC Act S.301 Criminal Complaint Filed with an

. 2561. The court sentenced the accused to 2 year imprisonment and a fine of 200,000 Baht. Since the accused pleaded guilty, the Court sentenced the accused to 1 year imprisonment and a fine of 100,000