obtaining authorization from client to make securities trading decision on behalf of client, in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 Re

Bangkok, April 11, 2013 - The SEC found that {A}, a former capital market investment consultant of Globex Securities Co. Ltd., obtained authorization to make decisions on behalf of her client and

the transactions. Failure to record the client's securities trading orders and obtaining authorization to make securities trading decisions on behalf of the client are, respectively, in violation of

. Mr.Voraphot Chanyakomol 3. Mr. Suebwong Kaewthipharat 4. Mr. Pisit Wannavalee Authorization of directors : Any two directors from Mr. Pana Janviroj or Mr. Voraphot Chanyakomol cosigns with Mr. Suebwong

per share, totaling transaction value of Baht 1,695 million (“The Acquisition”), and the authorization of directors and/or any person authorized to have power to determine and perform any procedure

: ...................................................... (…………………………………………….) Authorized person Date: ......................................... Remarks: 1. In case of authorization for submission of documents, a power of attorney is required. 2. In case of a juristic person, the

authorization, consequently causing damage to the client. She was working for Globlex Securities Co., Ltd. when the misconduct was committed.In the case of {B}, according to a client's complaint, his employer

derivatives and securities trade order instructions, respectively. Obtaining authorization to make securities trading decisions on behalf of the client and failing to keep records of clients? derivatives or

clients who were his friends, while {A} took such orders without any written authorization from those 12 clients.{A}'s action was deemed failure to perform duties with responsibility and due care as the

securities trading account to trade securities for others and accepting authorization to make securities trading decision on behalf of client, in violation of Clause 20(1) and (2) of the Notification of