maintain the situation. 8) Opinions of the Company’s Audit Committee and/or directors which are different from the opinions of the Board of Directors in Clause 7) above The Audit Committee and the Board of
the opinion of the Board of Director as per clause 11) Board of Directors has an opinion in accordance with the resolution of the Board of Directors above and no audit committee has different opinion
resolution of the Board of Directors above and no audit committee has different opinion from the resolution. However, since in the past, the Company process properly according to the notification of the
3.36 3.35 3.36 Cost per ASK excluding fuel cost 2.67 2.75 2.68 2.72 RASK – CASK (0.32) (0.44) 0.15 (0.02) Remarks (1) These figures are different from those included in Company’s consolidated Financial
3.36 3.35 3.36 Cost per ASK excluding fuel cost 2.67 2.75 2.68 2.72 RASK – CASK (0.32) (0.44) 0.15 (0.02) Remarks (1) These figures are different from those included in Company’s consolidated Financial
using the “partial service” business model for some CMG customers, which is different than the “full service”. Therefore, volume growth will be higher than value growth but will not affect the Company’s
per ASK excluding fuel cost 2.69 2.91 2.67 2.77 RASK – CASK 0.03 (0.16) 0.12 (0.06) Remark (1) These figures are different from those included in Company’s consolidated Financial Statements as they
-Translation- No. ECF2 044/2561 3 December 2018 Subject: Notification of the resolutions of the Board of Directors’ Meeting approving the investment in purchasing the ordinary shares of S-TREK (Thailand) Co., Ltd., capital increase, and the issuance and allocation of the newly issued ordinary shares to the specific person under the private placement basis, and the schedule for Extraordinary General Meeting No. 1/2019 To President The Stock Exchange of Thailand Enclosure 1. Information Memorandum...
and/or Directors with Different Opinion from the Board of Directors under Clause 8 above -None-
Broadcast Co., Ltd. This debtor has been sued for 3 times based on different sources of obligation as described below. 1.3.1 Case 1: Filing a lawsuit based on a Program Co-production Contract towards the