awareness in this matter and drive the project “Spot the Scammers, Be Cautious Before Investing” towards successful outcomes.”As the SEC’s priority is given to deterrence of investment frauds and scams, the
while knowing or possessing the inside information given by Kitti was deemed a violation of Section 242(1) and liable to the penalties under Section 296 and Section 296/2 of the SEA. The Civil Sanction
penalties under Section 296 of the said Act. In the case of Sasipas, she sold STEC shares while knowing or possessing the inside information given by Woraphant, which was an offense under Section 242(1) in
to have a variety of investment options and risk diversification appropriate for their investment objectives. For investment made via Thai business operators, investors will be given advices on foreign
” seminar’s morning session involved a lecture given by, SEC Deputy Secretary-General Sirivipa Supantanet, to provide knowledge about the capital market which can be accessed by business operators and
, Chairman, Thai Institute of Directors.In addition, awards were given to the top 50 listed companies with the highest ASEAN CG Scorecard scores. All of which have passed the validation process by KPMG, an
competition. Additional weight would be given to persons with knowledge and experiences related to SET businesses, securities business or financial business. Moreover, it would be taken into consideration
services to keep pace with the changing market landscape. Given such conditions, revisions and modifications of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) were proposed to amend certain provisions
application of the law, must have clarified such issues for IFEC. As a result, the SEC has given an order today, instructing the company’s directors to proceed with a shareholders meeting as a matter of
Civil Sanction Consideration Committee by the time given, the SEC took the view that Mr. Suphanan did not consent to bring an end to the case at the SEC level. The SEC has therefore sent a letter to the