accused; however, attempt to arrest the offender failed and the statute of limitations ran out. SEC Act S.300 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 06/01/2022

report for the first half of the fiscal year 2020 and (Interim Management Discussion and Analysis to the SEC within the specified period The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused

individuals accused of falsifying accounts and financial statements and  deceiving the public* in the STARK case. In this regard, the public prosecutor reported the accused persons to the Court and

Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a total fine of Baht 337,000 and a further fine of Baht 200 each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. Since the

judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case and sentenced the accused to12 year imprisonment for breaching of Section 56 and Section 312 of Securities and Exchange

Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case and sentenced the accused to12 year imprisonment for breaching of Section 56 and Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act of 1992

of Benson Dupont Capital Management.? On the grounds that the accused person?s deposition was beneficial to the case, the Court sentenced Ravi to a two-year imprisonment.? The Court, however, dismissed

accused persons are offenders shall be subject to the investigation of the inquiry official, the prosecution of the public prosecutor, and the adjudication and discretion of the court of justice

in the first paragraph of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The Supreme Court sentenced the accused to 1-year imprisonment and pay a total fine of Baht 1,000,000 for violating Sections 281/2 paragraph 2 of the

") against Theeratchanon, Supaporn, and the above eight others, who were authorized to act for gas bottling plants, for the above misconducts. The prosecutor had charged the two accused and juristic persons