Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code. As {A} {B} {C} {D} and {E} declined to enter the settlement procedure, the SEC therefore filed criminal complaint

under Section 296 of the said Act. As he agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee ordered him to pay a fine of 500,000 baht.?

qualifications of CIS to be offered to non-retail investor in Thailand, conditions relating to offer of CIS, duty of selling agent as well as procedure for filing of application for inspection on qualifications of

, duty of selling agent as well as procedure for filing of application for inspection on qualifications of CIS and allocation of quota for offshore securities investment. Stakeholders and the interested

Somchai, Chaninun, and Thanakorn were deemed as violation of Sections 243(1), (2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). All of them were allowed to enter the settlement procedure. As

Somchai, Chaninun, and Thanakorn were deemed as violation of Sections 243(1), (2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). All of them were allowed to enter the settlement procedure. As

Somchai, Chaninun, and Thanakorn were deemed as violation of Sections 243(1), (2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). All of them were allowed to enter the settlement procedure. As

Somchai, Chaninun, and Thanakorn were deemed as violation of Sections 243(1), (2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). All of them were allowed to enter the settlement procedure. As

Code.As they all agreed to enter into the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee imposed a fine of 500,000 baht on {A} {B} and {C} each; and a fine of 333,333.33 baht on {D} and {E} each.     

procedure, the Settlement Committee imposed a fine on {A} in the amount of 25, 665, 197.13 baht and a fine of 333,333.33 baht on {B} {C} and {D} each.