machinery for plastic waste fuel refinery project. The said persons were {A}, {B} and {C}, ex-directors and executives of PRO, and {D}, Managing Director of Therm Engineering Co., Ltd. Their actions were in
purchased, 345 million baht, is overevaluate regarding to inaccurate raw material price specified in a fuel sale contracts made by Mr. Sutat to SK1. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case
purchased is overevaluate regarding to inaccurate raw material price specified in fuel sale contracts made by Mr. Sutat Suklert to SK1. Mr. Saran suggested Mr. Sutat enter into the contract and the contract
owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial statements for the
outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial statements for the year 2015 without
the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial
believing that the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual
auditor into believing that the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the
3,693.57 (1,258.59) (34.1) Profit before FX 532.44 2,175.99 (1,643.55) (75.5) 2,516.29 3,879.22 (1,362.93) (35.1) * excluding fuel cost Quarter 2 6-Month Increase (Decrease) % Increase (Decrease) % The