normal market conditions. Furthermore, these transactions misled other persons to into thinking that these securities were traded in significant volume and lured others to participate in the trading. This
. Furthermore, these transactions misled other persons to into thinking that these securities were traded in significant volume and lured others to participate in the trading. This case is in the process of
. Furthermore, these transactions misled other persons to into thinking that these securities were traded in significant volume and lured others to participate in the trading. This case is in the process of
. Furthermore, these transactions misled other persons to into thinking that these securities were traded in significant volume and lured others to participate in the trading. This case is in the process of
persons’ securities trading accounts. They traded RICH shares on a continual basis and matched orders within the group to mislead the general public in RICH share trading values and volumes, causing
’ securities trading accounts. They traded RICH shares on a continual basis and matched orders within the group to mislead the general public in RICH share trading values and volumes, causing inconsistency with
. They traded RICH shares on a continual basis and matched orders within the group to mislead the general public in RICH share trading values and volumes, causing inconsistency with normal market condition
. They traded RICH shares on a continual basis and matched orders within the group to mislead the general public in RICH share trading values and volumes, causing inconsistency with normal market condition
stimulated the share's movements, and arranging low-price matching for the trading activities within their own group. Such transactions misled other investors into believing that TAPAC shares were traded
the share's movements, and arranging low-price matching for the trading activities within their own group. Such transactions misled other investors into believing that TAPAC shares were traded in