the year 2013 (Form 56-2, 2013) to the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, attempt to arrest the alleged offender

year 2013 (Form 56-2, 2013) to the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, attempt to arrest the alleged offender failed

financial statements for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 to the SEC and the SET with in the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however

under Section 289. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 09/03/2015

(1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated

(Form 56-1, 2014) period ended December 31, 2014 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, attempt to

prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, attempt to arrest the alleged offender failed and the statute of limitations ran out. SEC Act S.300 Criminal Complaint Filed with

. (Form 56-1, 2014) and the annual report for the year 2014. (Form 56-2, 2014) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged

56-1, 2014X and the annual report for the year 2014 (Form 56-2, 2014) to the SEC and the SET with in the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender

Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. On October 3, 2018, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 90 and 289 of the SEC Act