, Chupong was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In this regard, Chupong, were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and
the duty of a director, a manager or a person with power of management, or an advisor: (1) being or having been a bankrupt; (2) having been imprisoned by the judgement of a court which is final for an
duty of a director, a manager or a person with power of management, or an advisor: (1) being or having been a bankrupt; (2) having been imprisoned by the judgement of a court which is final for an
with law on protection and suppression of money laundering; (4) was convicted by the court’s final judgment on the offences relating to property committed https://www.sec.or.th/EN/Pages/LawandRegulations
) MinistrialNotificationMNSEAPVD-8Notification proceedings instituted by the authorities in accordance with law on protection and suppression of money laundering; (4) was convicted by the court’s final judgment on the offences
ให้สอดคล้องกับ https://dividend.sec.or.th/stat-report/16_DEF_PMF_REGIS_TH.doc Section 103 offence related to property committed with dishonest intent; (3) having been a director, a manager or a person
Mr. SomChai Kurujitkosol The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.287 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 17/06/2009
. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. DV Act S.343 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 18/12/2009
of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 23/06