in public relations and some parts of customer services such as giving Binance’s customers some advice and resolving their problems. The act mentioned above was considered as supporter of Binance in

, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved by the SEC

, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved by the SEC

, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved by the SEC

utility token, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved

, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved by the SEC

utility token, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved

-use utility token, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider

show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and

financial statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the