Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee had resolved to impose a civil sanction on the three offenders who were subject to pay a separate civil penalty and compensate for the benefits that should have

Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee had resolved to impose a civil sanction on the three offenders who were subject to pay a separate civil penalty and compensate for the benefits that should

had committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the punishment prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) for being a director who acted to obtain falsified accounts or

offences regarding  market misconduct, and introducing civil penalty as an alternative sanction. Assistant Secretary-General Sakkarin Ruamrangsri said: ?The nature of market misconduct has become more

Section 3 of the Penal Code. The Court inflicted the punishment of 1 year imprisonment and 1,00,000 Baht fine. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 6

), which is punishable under Section 274. In addition, the responsible management may be liable to punishment as prescribed by law. The SEC shall consider further legal action in due course

information to trade securities for his own and others? benefits  in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section 296 of the

dividend payment from IT Q4/2012 operational result. The aforesaid action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section 296 of the Act. The Settlement Committee therefore imposed a 2,820,000 baht fine on Ratanachai.

suspended the determination of punishment for 2 years and sentenced the defendant a fine of Baht 300 for each day starting from July 25, 2015 until the defendant reduces the holding of KC shares to the number