action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
BLISS’s assets to invest in share warrants of C.I. Group Public Company Limited (“CIG-W1”) in 2010 for other persons’ benefits. This caused BLISS to have 17.4 million baht loss from such investment in CIG
assets to invest in share warrants of C.I. Group Public Company Limited (“CIG-W1”) in 2010 for other persons’ benefits. This caused BLISS to have 17.4 million baht loss from such investment in CIG-W1
trading shares in the SET. He also gained benefits from which his IFEC shares of more than 57.46 million used as the collateral for his margin trading were not subject to force selling. As a result, he
. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition, the
Mr. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition
acts of Mr. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307