) -4.95% Cost of sales 281.33 227.95 (53.38) -18.97% 506.06 497.14 (8.92) -1.76% Gross profit 290.22 245.63 (44.59) -15.36% 537.04 496.04 (41.00) -7.63% % Gross profit 50.78% 51.87% 51.48% 49.94% Selling
% Cost of sales - 191.6 - 160.8 -19.1% Selling expenses - 4.7 - 4.0 -17.8% Administrative expenses - 10.1 - 11.9 15.5% Finance costs - 2.8 - 3.0 5.3% Profit for the period 12.7 20.6 -38.5% Net Profit 5.7
making a forward exchange contact. The Company can maintain the level of selling and administrative expenses. Including, financial costs in the same criteria. The Company therefore earned net profit in Q2
Expenses 47 43 9 Allowance for doubtful account (Reverse) (1) 2 (150) Allowance for diminution in value of goods (4) (2) 200 Operating Profit 61 53 15 Less Loss from change in fair value of financial 67 4
1 Forth Smart Service Public Company Limited (FSMART) 3Q2020 Management Discussion and Analysis Operational Summary in 3Q20 (recovered from Covid-19 pandemic) Net profit was Bt123mn, increasing
net profit were Baht 45,740.09 million and Baht 3,609.72 million, down by 9.41% and 18.49% respectively. The declining of operating result over last year mainly due to the store closure in both Thailand
launch of Singha Complex in late 2018. 2019 Net profit at THB 1,209m, or 16% decline YoY, due to various factors, namely profit margin during early stage of 2 hotels in Crossroads project phase 1
Osotspa Public Company Limited Q3’18 and 9M18 Management Discussion & Analysis 14 November 2018 Q3’18 and 9M18 Management Discussion & Analysis Page 1/7 Financial Highlights Q3’18 profit attributable
Discussion & Analysis Q4/2021 Operating Highlights in Q4/2021 Q4/20 Q4/21 Change +/(-) 2020 2021 Change +/(-) (THB million) %YoY %YoY Operating Revenue 207 188 (9%) 768 620 (19%) Gross Profit 127 112 (12%) 468
gained from Phase 3 of the new plant that supported volume growth helped lessen the effect of the above on profit margin. The Company was capable to maintain a satisfactory level of profitability that