of 115k subscribers, a strong increase of 25% YoY. The increase was due to an expansion of service coverage to more suburb areas as well as efforts to reduce the churn rate from the strategy to offer
ทธิต่อก าไรก่อนดอกเบี้ยจ่าย ภาษีเงินได้ค่าเสื่อมราคา และค่าตัดจ าหน่าย (net debt to EBITDA ratio) (2) อัตราส่วนความสามารถในการช าระดอกเบี้ย (interest coverage ratio) (3) อัตราส่วนความสามารถในการช าระ
ดังนี้ (1) อัตราส่วนหนี้สินสุทธิต่อก าไรก่อนดอกเบี้ยจ่าย ภาษีเงินได้ค่าเสื่อมราคา และค่าตัดจ าหน่าย (net debt to EBITDA ratio) (2) อัตราส่วนความสามารถในการช าระดอกเบี้ย (interest coverage ratio) (3
Cycle (Days) 46 50 Total Debt to Equity Ratio (Times) 0.55 0.71 Interest Coverage Ratio (Times) 88.49 43.82 Debt Service Coverage Ratio (Times) 4.60 2.59 - 9 - (3) Asset Management Capability (3.1) Debtor
Period (Days) 46 47 Inventory Turnover Period (Days) 18 17 Average Payable Period (Days) 17 15 Cash Cycle (Days) 47 49 Total Debt to Equity Ratio (Times) 0.78 0.55 Interest Coverage Ratio (Times) 53.85
rising plus additional coverage of 5G in key area. The growing COVID-19 impact on economy is likely to be less pronounced to telecom spending which is relatively resilient in nature to the economic
rising plus additional coverage of 5G in key area. The growing COVID-19 impact on economy is likely to be less pronounced to telecom spending which is relatively resilient in nature to the economic
the financial risk perspective, despite the higher debt ratio stemming from increased loans and lower shareholder equity, the ratio was nonetheless at relatively low level. The interest coverage ratio
& Financial Policy Unit 31 Dec 2017 31 Dec 2016 Debt to Equity Ratio Times 0.62 0.79 Interest Coverage Ratio Times 11.25 9.49 Debt Service Coverage Ratio Times 1.38 1.76 According to the liquidity ratio and
’ equity as mentioned above. For the financial risk perspective, despite the higher debt ratio comparing to previous year, the ratio was nonetheless at relatively low level. Interest coverage ratio (EBITDA