contain any false or misleading statement in materiality nor omission of any material statement that ought to be declared and that the financial statements and financial information referred to in this
have strong financial product knowledge. Moreover, financial product advertisements are subject to the regulations so the advertisements must not distract or lure the customers and cause misleading about
action against or being punished in the past according to the management in the manner of deception, defraud or dishonest to properties as prescribed in Clause 25; (3) prohibited characteristic of Group 3
offence related to property committed with dishonest intent; (3) having been a director, a manager or a person with power of management of a financial institution which had its license revoked, unless an
offence related to property committed with dishonest intent; (3) having been a director, a manager or a person with power of management of a financial institution which had its license revoked, unless an
committed an offense under Section 89/25*, for example, taking the assets of the juristic person with dishonest intent, obtaining unlawful gains which damages the juristic person, or altering, shortening
higher risk level in buying financial products with a higher risk than the client’s risk profile. SEC has considered the case and viewed that Somchai had behaviors with dishonest implication, affecting the
juristic person with dishonest intent, obtaining unlawful gains which damages the juristic person, or altering, shortening or falsifying documents. In addition, SEC has prescribed a procedure for
committed upon the dishonest misappropriation of the fund for personal gains. The actions committed by Mr. Chiyachantana and Ms. Hongsri were liable to be the offenses under Section 308, Section 311
and executives of KC and others for jointly committing with dishonest intent by authorizing KC to http://market.sec.or.th/public/idisc/en/Enforce