17/08/2023 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under the Court of First Instance considerationThe case that appears in the details
regular review as to adequacy of measure and system for preventing and managing conflicts of interest as prescribed in sub clause (2). Additionally, in case there is an occurrence affecting the preventing
. Fast track case for companies with good corporate governance and offer for sale of shares at a price not lower than the market price, which do not sell a share swap and the number of shares offered for
suspended for two years. The later, on February 18, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The case was deemed final. On April 10, 2018
and found noise trading risks in trading of securities on the SET. The finding suggested that non-fundamental factors highly influenced the SET Index; trading volumes, for instance. Whilst, the market
investment exceeding 100% of NAV will be classified as high risk products and subject to additional regulations to mitigate risk of misselling; for instance, description of the worst case scenario for
, 311, and 313 of the said Act. This case is under consideration of the Court of First Instance. SEC Act S.307 308 311 312 313 in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed
others to use their trading accounts. This case is under consideration of the Court of First Instance. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal
use their trading accounts. This case is under consideration of the Court of First Instance. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code