Mrs. Rachada Srivirojnawong for her own and other persons’ benefits. The purchases were made in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to SPSU share price
, transfer of securities ownership , pledge and seize, as well as the closing of the book in order to have information on securities holders, deal with rights and benefits arising from securities such as https
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
BLISS’s assets to invest in share warrants of C.I. Group Public Company Limited (“CIG-W1”) in 2010 for other persons’ benefits. This caused BLISS to have 17.4 million baht loss from such investment in CIG
assets to invest in share warrants of C.I. Group Public Company Limited (“CIG-W1”) in 2010 for other persons’ benefits. This caused BLISS to have 17.4 million baht loss from such investment in CIG-W1
trading shares in the SET. He also gained benefits from which his IFEC shares of more than 57.46 million used as the collateral for his margin trading were not subject to force selling. As a result, he
. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition, the
Mr. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition