her employer bank a report on her severe professional misconduct which was considered dishonest and unethical behavior in violation of Clauses 3(10) and (12) of the Notification of the Capital Market

later informed his client of the trading orders already submitted. The client did not specify securities, amount and price but accepted the transactions. Making securities trading decisions on behalf of

I-Mobile Plc. (SIM) and Samart Telcoms Plc. (SAMTEL) as well as Somchai Vimorkcharoensuk and Somruay Sae-lim for aiding and abetting such manipulation, in the total amount of 36,605,453.69 baht; and(3

Management?), failed to order or act his duty resulting in Asia Wealth Asset Management violation of section 113 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. Asia Wealth Asset Management failed to comply

Management?), failed to order or act his duty resulting in Asia Wealth Asset Management violation of section 113 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. Asia Wealth Asset Management failed to comply

to order or act her duty resulting in Asia Wealth Asset Management violation of section 113 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. Asia Wealth Asset Management failed to comply with the rules

or act his duty resulting in SKFM violation of section 117, section 133 paragraph 2 and section 136 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. SKFM failed to comply with the rules, conditions

without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289, and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003

obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289, and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16

www.saxomarkets.com.sg without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289, and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546