subsidiary of KC, namely (1) Mr. Kittisan Mookdee, (2) Mr. Teerasit Sangngern and (3) Mr. Sunchai Intarauksorn jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent, committed dishonest converting KC’s
subsidiary of KC, namely (1) Mr. Kittisan Mookdee, (2) Mr. Teerasit Sangngern and (3) Mr. Sunchai Intarauksorn jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent, committed dishonest converting KC’s
subsidiary of KC, namely (1) Mr. Kittisan Mookdee, (2) Mr. Teerasit Sangngern and (3) Mr. Sunchai Intarauksorn jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent, committed dishonest converting KC’s
”), which is a subsidiary of KC, namely (1) Mr. Kittisan Mookdee, (2) Mr. Teerasit Sangngern and (3) Mr. Sunchai Intarauksorn jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent, committed dishonest
Nutvara Seangwarin (3) Mr.Supoth Piansiri (4) Mr.Sirichai Chananam, jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent causing damage to NMG and jointly committed or permitted another person to
Nutvara Seangwarin (3) Mr.Supoth Piansiri (4) Mr.Sirichai Chananam, jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent causing damage to NMG and jointly committed or permitted another person to
Seangwarin (3) Mr.Supoth Piansiri (4) Mr.Sirichai Chananam, jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent causing damage to NMG and jointly committed or permitted another person to make false
Seangwarin (3) Mr.Supoth Piansiri (4) Mr.Sirichai Chananam, jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent causing damage to NMG and jointly committed or permitted another person to make false
to order or act where he has the duty, resulted in the offence committed by Zipmex concerning the case that during May 8, 2022, to July 20, 2022, Zipmex induced its own customers to deploy ZipUp
a judgement that the defendant had committed an offense under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty in amount of 333,333.33 Baht. Moreover, the court ordered the defendants to