(2) Mr. Patiphat Supasirisin and (3) Mr. Sakesan Baisak jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition, the
. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition, the
Mr. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition
acts of Mr. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In
gained the benefit were dishonest duty performance, as specified under Section 89/7 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The public prosecutor decided not to pursue the case in court and the case
, especially the widely used appraisal. Clause 4 In order to obtain an approval to be an appraisal company in capital market and a lead appraiser, any appraisal company having such wish shall submit an
, fraudulent or dishonest acts that results in widespread damage, either in accordance with Thai or foreign laws; (3) being currently subject to a criminal complaint or legal prosecution by a relevant agency in
(paragraph ........); ( 2.1.2 incorrect use of accounting policy (paragraph........); ( 2.1.3 inappropriate/insufficient disclosure of information (paragraph........). ( 2.2 Inability to obtain sufficient
2.1.3 inappropriate/insufficient disclosure of information (paragraph........). ฆ 2.2 Inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence and the possible effects are material, but not pervasive